NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2115MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
+9047%
12.99 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 520M
0.142 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
+8059%
7180
GeForce GT 520M
88
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2011
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 500M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1635 MHz
Base Clock
-
2115 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
1
3072
Shading Units
48
96
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
101.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.480 GPixel/s
203.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.920 GTexel/s
12.99 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.99 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
142.1 GFLOPS
203.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
11.84 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
12W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GF119
-
GPU Variant
N12P-GV-B-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
