NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 60.00GB/s)
4416 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 115W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
+2525%
15.62 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 560M
0.595 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
May 2011
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 500M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
60.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
36
SM Count
4
4608
Shading Units
192
144
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
24
144
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 MB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
81.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.200 GPixel/s
244.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.80 GTexel/s
15.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.62 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
595.2 GFLOPS
244.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
49.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
115W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD106
GPU Name
GF116
-
GPU Variant
N12E-GS-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
22.9 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
188 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
