Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 432.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation +188%
23.04 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
7.987 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2016
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1725 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
40
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
4096
160
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
64
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
48 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
Capsaicin
-
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net