NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs ATI FirePro V3900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
4640 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+3592%
23.04 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Feb 2012
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
40
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
480
160
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
8
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
48 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
50W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
Turks
-
GPU Variant
Turks GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0
