Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM GeForce G210 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 8.064GB/s)
5104 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation +53481%
23.04 TFLOPS
GeForce G210 OEM
0.043 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
May 2009
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1725 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
504 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.064GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
40
SM Count
2
5120
Shading Units
16
160
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
43.20 GFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

100W
TDP
31W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
G96C
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy