NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 1030 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 53% (2250MHz vs 1468MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
4736 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+1944%
23.04 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 1030
1.127 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
May 2017
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
1228 MHz
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
1468 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
40
SM Count
3
5120
Shading Units
384
160
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
16
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.49 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.23 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
17.62 GFLOPS
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1127 GFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.23 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
30W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
GP108
-
GPU Variant
GP108-300-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
