NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
5072 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+14669%
23.04 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 230
0.156 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Oct 2009
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
40
SM Count
6
5120
Shading Units
48
160
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
16
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
156.0 GFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
G94B
-
GPU Variant
G94-300-B1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
