NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
5024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+9500%
23.04 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 230 OEM
0.24 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Apr 2009
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
192bit
Memory Bus
192bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
24.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
40
SM Count
12
5120
Shading Units
96
160
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
12
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.000 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
G92B
-
GPU Variant
G92-159-B1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
