Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
4992 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation +5853%
23.04 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1725 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
40
SM Count
16
5120
Shading Units
128
160
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
16
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.23 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.93 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
387.1 GFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

100W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
G92B
-
GPU Variant
G92-428-B1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy