NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 42% (2250MHz vs 1590MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
4224 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Lower TDP (90W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+708%
23.04 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
2.849 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
40
SM Count
14
5120
Shading Units
896
160
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
32
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
90W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
TU106
-
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
