Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 768MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
4784 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation +2440%
23.04 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 460
0.907 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jul 2010
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1725 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
192bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
86.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
40
SM Count
7
5120
Shading Units
336
160
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
24
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.450 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.80 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
907.2 GFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
75.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
160W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
GF104
-
GPU Variant
GF104-300-KB-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy