Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 134.4GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation +2037%
23.04 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
1.078 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1725 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
134.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
40
SM Count
16
5120
Shading Units
512
160
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
48
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.86 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.73 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1078 GFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

100W
TDP
375W
300 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-ES-DT1-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy