NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 118% (2250MHz vs 1032MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 144.2GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 134W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+1353%
23.04 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
1.585 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
980 MHz
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
1032 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
192bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
144.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
40
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
768
160
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
24
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
48 MB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.51 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.05 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.585 TFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
66.05 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
134W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
GK106
-
GPU Variant
GK106-240-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
