Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti OEM

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 110W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation +1516%
23.04 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 650 Ti OEM
1.425 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1725 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
86.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
40
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
768
160
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
16
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
48 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.85 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.39 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1425 GFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.39 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
110W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
GK106
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy