NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 690 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 121% (2250MHz vs 1019MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+636%
23.04 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 690
3.13 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
May 2012
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
915 MHz
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
1019 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
40
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
1536
160
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
48 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.61 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
130.4 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.130 TFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
130.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-355-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
