NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA NVS 810
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM NVS 810 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 118% (2250MHz vs 1033MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 810 's Advantages
Lower TDP (68W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+2077%
23.04 TFLOPS
NVS 810
1.058 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Nov 2015
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
902 MHz
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
40
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
512
160
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.53 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.06 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1058 GFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
33.06 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
68W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
8x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
5.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
