NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX A4000H
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 16GB VRAM RTX A4000H to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 44% (2250MHz vs 1560MHz)
Lower TDP (100W vs 140W)
NVIDIA RTX A4000H 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 432.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+20%
23.04 TFLOPS
RTX A4000H
19.17 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
735 MHz
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
40
SM Count
48
5120
Shading Units
6144
160
TMUs
192
64
ROPs
96
160
Tensor Cores
192
40
RT Cores
48
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.17 TFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
140W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
GA104
-
GPU Variant
GA104-???-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
8 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
