Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro M3900

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro M3900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
4960 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation +6491%
15.82 TFLOPS
FirePro M3900
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Oct 2010
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1110 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
40
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
160
160
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
48 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
247.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
15.82 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
247.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

100W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
Seymour
-
GPU Variant
Seymour GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy