NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA A2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 16GB VRAM A2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 23% (2175MHz vs 1770MHz)
More VRAM (20GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 200.1GB/s)
4864 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 130W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+489%
26.73 TFLOPS
A2
4.531 TFLOPS
Blender
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+425%
4737
A2
902
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Nov 2021
Workstation Ada
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
1440 MHz
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
20GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
160bit
Memory Bus
128bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
200.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
48
SM Count
10
6144
Shading Units
1280
192
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
32
192
Tensor Cores
40
48
RT Cores
10
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
139.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.64 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
70.80 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.531 TFLOPS
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.531 TFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
70.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
130W
TDP
60W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
8 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
294 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.6
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
