NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX 8 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM CMP 170HX 8 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 54% (2175MHz vs 1410MHz)
More VRAM (20GB vs 8GB)
1664 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 8 GB 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.49TB/s vs 360.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+111%
26.73 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX 8 GB
12.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Sep 2021
Workstation Ada
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz
Memory
20GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
160bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1.49TB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
48
SM Count
70
6144
Shading Units
4480
192
TMUs
280
64
ROPs
128
192
Tensor Cores
280
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
139.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS
Board Design
130W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
GA100
-
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
7 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
8.0
6.8
Shader Model
N/A
