Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro W8100

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro W8100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 220W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +533%
26.73 TFLOPS
FirePro W8100
4.219 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Jun 2014
Quadro Ada(x000A)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
512bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
40
48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
2560
192
TMUs
160
80
ROPs
64
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
48 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

174.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.74 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.8 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.219 TFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.109 TFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
220W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
Hawaii
-
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL40
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy