NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro W9100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 275W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+410%
26.73 TFLOPS
FirePro W9100
5.238 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+303%
14340
FirePro W9100
3552
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Mar 2014
Workstation Ada
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
20GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
512bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
44
48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
2816
192
TMUs
176
64
ROPs
64
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
48 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
139.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS
Board Design
130W
TDP
275W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
Hawaii
-
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.3
