NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs AMD FireStream 9350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
4704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+1225%
26.73 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Jun 2010
Workstation Ada
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
20GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
18
48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
1440
192
TMUs
72
64
ROPs
32
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
48 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
139.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
130W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
Cypress
-
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.0
