NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM GeForce 310 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
6128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 130W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+59300%
26.73 TFLOPS
GeForce 310 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Nov 2009
Workstation Ada
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
333 MHz
Memory
20GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
160bit
Memory Bus
64bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
5.328GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
48
SM Count
2
6144
Shading Units
16
192
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
139.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
130W
TDP
31W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
GT218-300-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
