NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 430 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
6048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 130W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+9836%
26.73 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 430 PCI
0.269 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Oct 2010
Workstation Ada
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
20GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
64bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
48
SM Count
2
6144
Shading Units
96
192
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
4
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
139.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.20 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
130W
TDP
49W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
GF108
-
GPU Variant
GF108-300-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
