NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 122% (2175MHz vs 980MHz)
More VRAM (20GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
4800 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 170W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+914%
26.73 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
2.634 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Aug 2013
Workstation Ada
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
915 MHz
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
980 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
20GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
1344
192
TMUs
112
64
ROPs
32
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
48 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
139.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.44 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
109.8 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.634 TFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
109.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
130W
TDP
170W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-325-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
