NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
More VRAM (20GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 216.0GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 21% (2640MHz vs 2175MHz)
Lower TDP (115W vs 130W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+97%
26.73 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4050
13.52 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Workstation Ada
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
2505 MHz
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
2640 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
20GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
160bit
Memory Bus
96bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
216.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
48
SM Count
18
6144
Shading Units
2560
192
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
192
Tensor Cores
120
48
RT Cores
18
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
32 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
139.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.48 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
211.2 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
13.52 TFLOPS
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.52 TFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
130W
TDP
115W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.9
6.8
Shader Model
6.8
