NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs Moore Threads MTT S3000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2175MHz
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 250W)
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 20GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 360.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+71%
26.73 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S3000
15.56 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Workstation Ada
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
1900 MHz
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
0 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
20GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
4096
192
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
256
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
139.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
486.4 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
486.4 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
31.13 TFLOPS
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.56 TFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
130W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
22 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5
