Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
5888 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 142W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +3844%
19.17 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Nov 2010
Quadro Ada
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

720 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
280.0GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
8
6144
Shading Units
256
192
TMUs
32
80
ROPs
32
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

124.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
142W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-825-A3
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy