Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 5600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
6016 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +5440%
19.17 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5600
0.346 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2007
Quadro Ada
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

720 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
384bit
280.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
16
6144
Shading Units
128
192
TMUs
32
80
ROPs
24
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

124.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.40 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
345.6 GFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

70W
TDP
171W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
G80
-
GPU Variant
G80-875-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
90 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.0
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy