NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1746MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.02TB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (122W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
+518%
13.41 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000 SYNC
2.169 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2018
Release Date
Jan 2013
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1746 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1.02TB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s
Render Config
60
Compute Units
-
48
SM Count
-
3840
Shading Units
1536
240
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
111.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
419.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
26.82 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.41 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
6.705 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
122W
700 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Vega 20
GPU Name
GK104
Vega 20 GLXT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
