Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro K600

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro K600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
5952 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +5605%
19.17 TFLOPS
Quadro K600
0.336 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Ada
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

720 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
128bit
280.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
192
192
TMUs
16
80
ROPs
16
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
48 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

124.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.504 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.02 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
336.4 GFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
14.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
41W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy