NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1746MHz vs 1700MHz)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (64GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 1.02TB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
13.41 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI210
+68%
22.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2018
Release Date
Dec 2021
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1746 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
64GB
HBM2
Memory Type
HBM2e
4096bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
1.02TB/s
Bandwidth
1638GB/s
Render Config
60
Compute Units
104
48
SM Count
-
3840
Shading Units
6656
240
TMUs
416
64
ROPs
0
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
111.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
419.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.2 GTexel/s
26.82 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
181.0 TFLOPS
13.41 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.63 TFLOPS
6.705 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.63 TFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
300W
700 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Vega 20
GPU Name
Aldebaran
Vega 20 GLXT
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
GCN 5.1
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
6 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
N/A
