Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro M6000

NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro M6000

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2025MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 43W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation +709%
8.294 TFLOPS
FirePro M6000
1.024 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Jul 2012
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
2025 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.80 GPixel/s
129.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.00 GTexel/s
8.294 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.294 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1024 GFLOPS
129.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
64.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
43W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Heathrow
-
GPU Variant
Heathrow XT GL (216-0835033)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net