NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro W5000 DVI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM FirePro W5000 DVI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
12032 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W5000 DVI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+5052%
65.28 TFLOPS
FirePro W5000 DVI
1.267 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Feb 2013
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1155 MHz
Base Clock
-
2550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
100
SM Count
-
12800
Shading Units
768
400
TMUs
48
176
ROPs
32
400
Tensor Cores
-
100
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
72 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
448.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
1020 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
65.28 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
65.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
1020 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
Pitcairn
AD102
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
