Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon HD 6290

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon HD 6290

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 6290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
12720 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Ada Generation +62669%
65.28 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6290
0.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Dec 2011
Quadro Ada
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1155 MHz
Base Clock
-
2550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
100
SM Count
-
12800
Shading Units
80
400
TMUs
8
176
ROPs
4
400
Tensor Cores
-
100
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
72 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

448.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
1020 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.200 GTexel/s
65.28 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
65.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.0 GFLOPS
1020 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
19W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
Cedar
AD102
GPU Variant
Cedar LE
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy