NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 8800 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (2550MHz vs 2430MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
8704 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (624.1GB/s vs 576.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (220W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+227%
65.28 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 8800 XT
19.91 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ada
Generation
Navi IV(RX 8000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1155 MHz
Base Clock
1295 MHz
2550 MHz
Boost Clock
2430 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
2438 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
624.1GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
100
SM Count
-
12800
Shading Units
4096
400
TMUs
256
176
ROPs
96
400
Tensor Cores
-
100
RT Cores
64
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
72 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
448.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
233.3 GPixel/s
1020 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
622.1 GTexel/s
65.28 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
39.81 TFLOPS
65.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.91 TFLOPS
1020 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
622.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
220W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a3x DisplayPort 2.1
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
Navi 48
AD102
GPU Variant
Navi 48 XT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
4 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
Unknown
609 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
