NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 13% (2550MHz vs 2250MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 432.0GB/s)
7680 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+183%
65.28 TFLOPS
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
23.04 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro Ada
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1155 MHz
Base Clock
1725 MHz
2550 MHz
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
100
SM Count
40
12800
Shading Units
5120
400
TMUs
160
176
ROPs
64
400
Tensor Cores
160
100
RT Cores
40
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
72 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
448.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
1020 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
65.28 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
65.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
1020 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
100W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
AD104
AD102
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
