NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro M2000
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
9248 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 120W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
+6710%
32.69 TFLOPS
FirePro M2000
0.48 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jul 2012
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
480
304
TMUs
24
112
ROPs
8
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
64 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.00 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
120W
TDP
33W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
Turks
-
GPU Variant
Turks GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.0
