Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro M4100

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro M4100

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM FirePro M4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2115MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
9344 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation +7905%
41.15 TFLOPS
FirePro M4100
0.514 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Oct 2013
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1425 MHz
Base Clock
-
2115 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
384
304
TMUs
24
112
ROPs
8
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

236.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.360 GPixel/s
643.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.08 GTexel/s
41.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
41.15 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
514.6 GFLOPS
643.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.16 GFLOPS

Board Design

120W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD103
GPU Name
Mars
-
GPU Variant
Mars M2 PRO/LP (216-0842009)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy