NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro W6170M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM FirePro W6170M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
8832 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
+1558%
32.69 TFLOPS
FirePro W6170M
1.971 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Aug 2014
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
14
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
896
304
TMUs
56
112
ROPs
16
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
Emerald
-
GPU Variant
Emerald XT GL
(216-0857001)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5
