Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 810M

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 810M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM GeForce 810M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 123% (2115MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
9344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 810M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 120W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation +5536%
41.15 TFLOPS
GeForce 810M
0.73 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2015
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 800M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1425 MHz
Base Clock
835 MHz
2115 MHz
Boost Clock
950 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
384
304
TMUs
32
112
ROPs
16
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

236.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
643.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.40 GTexel/s
41.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
41.15 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
729.6 GFLOPS
643.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

120W
TDP
45W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD103
GPU Name
GK107
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy