NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation and 256MB VRAM GeForce Go 6800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 18 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
9728 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 120W)
Score
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Nov 2004
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce Go 6
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-III
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
550 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
-
304
TMUs
12
112
ROPs
8
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
64 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.600 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
120W
TDP
45W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
NV41
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
130 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
3.0
