Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 325M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
9680 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 120W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation +34310%
32.69 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 325M
0.095 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2010
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 300M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
76
SM Count
6
9728
Shading Units
48
304
TMUs
16
112
ROPs
8
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
64 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
95.04 GFLOPS
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

120W
TDP
23W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD103
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
N11P-GV1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net