Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock2115MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
9664 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 120W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation +21332%
41.15 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 160M
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 100M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1425 MHz
Base Clock
-
2115 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

76
SM Count
8
-
Compute Units
-
9728
Shading Units
64
304
TMUs
32
112
ROPs
16
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
64 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

236.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
643.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
41.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
41.15 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
643.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD103
GPU Name
G94
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GS1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Board Design

120W
TDP
60W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy