NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce MX110
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX110 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 67% (1680MHz vs 1006MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 40.10GB/s)
9472 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX110 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 120W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
+6247%
32.69 TFLOPS
GeForce MX110
0.515 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Nov 2017
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce MX(1xx)
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
978 MHz
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
1006 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
40.10GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
256
304
TMUs
16
112
ROPs
8
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
64 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.048 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.10 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
515.1 GFLOPS
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
16.10 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
GM108S
-
GPU Variant
N16V-GMR1-S-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
5.0
6.8
Shader Model
6.7 (5.1)
