Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon E2400

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon E2400

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation and 128MB VRAM Radeon E2400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2115MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
9688 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon E2400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 120W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation +85629%
41.15 TFLOPS
Radeon E2400
0.048 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

1425 MHz
Base Clock
-
2115 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
40
304
TMUs
4
112
ROPs
4
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
64 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

236.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
643.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
41.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
41.15 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.00 GFLOPS
643.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

120W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD103
GPU Name
RV610
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy