NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R7 A265
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 A265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 104% (1680MHz vs 825MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
9344 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
+5064%
32.69 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 A265
0.633 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2014
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
725 MHz
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
825 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
384
304
TMUs
24
112
ROPs
8
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.80 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
633.6 GFLOPS
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
39.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
Opal
-
GPU Variant
Opal XT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
