Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M295X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2115MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
7680 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (120W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation +1289%
41.15 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M295X
2.961 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Nov 2014
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1425 MHz
Base Clock
-
2115 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
2048
304
TMUs
128
112
ROPs
32
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

236.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.14 GPixel/s
643.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.54 GTexel/s
41.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.961 TFLOPS
41.15 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.961 TFLOPS
643.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
185.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

120W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD103
GPU Name
Amethyst
-
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
5 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy