NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 620M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 620M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
9632 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 620M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
+13520%
32.69 TFLOPS
GeForce 620M
0.24 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2012
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 600M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
76
SM Count
2
9728
Shading Units
96
304
TMUs
16
112
ROPs
8
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.500 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
GF117
-
GPU Variant
N13P-GLP
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
